I guess we still aren't done with the restraining order bullsh*t
So in the latest of the saga with the inlaws, FIL has now gotten a restraining order against DH. It should NOT have been granted, there is zero legal basis. But as I said in the last blog post, the judge didn't seemed to understand that there could be domestic violence between 2 men (or father and son) and didn't appear to take it very seriously. And said she could have found DH guilty of harassment also because of the physical fight.
To get a restraining order granted there needs to be clear and PRESENT danger. DH has not spoken to anyone in his family since FIL came to our house. He has never had another physical altercation with him. He has not been to his parents house in over 2 years. He hasn't invited them to our house or texted anyone in his family first in nearly 2 years. Filing for a restraining order 6 months after an incident when the petitioner came to OUR home and started a fight is absolutely not a legal basis to ask for protection and I'm furious it was granted because its further harassment. Also, I have a feeling they're going to be making false claims that he has broken it to try to get him in legal trouble like FIL is. Theres something seriously wrong when someone's parents won't leave them alone even after legal intervention.