You are here

Question as a BM

justmakingthebest's picture

Over the summer my ex took me back to court to try and reduce CS because he has another kid. It hadn't been modified in a couple of years, I was no longer paying daycare but he had a substantial pay raise... so whatever. When I looked at it through the state calculator the worst case I could find was a lowered amount of $40/ month and best case was it went up $70. So anyway the date comes, I agree to let him count summer camp (which he shouldn't get to count by our county standards since I have sole physical- we aren't joint physical). Then I agree to letting it lower a little more for a reduction of about $100. TOTALLY VOLUNTARY trying to keep peace with him and his wife.

About 3 months later I found out he got another rank up in the military- which comes along with hefty pay increases in pay and housing. I didn't take him back for a modification. I was pretty pissed he went in trying for a reduction when he knew he was about to make even more money, but whatever. The way I saw it was if I ever needed them to do anything- like winter coats, new shoes, sports dues for the kids or whatever, as long as they did that, I was cool with it. Not every month making it a thing, but if I was ever tight.

So, I asked this month for them to cover SD's softball dues. $95- he came back stating he already contributed enough to my household. Now keep in mind I haven't asked for a thing since September when I asked them to grab 1 of the kids winter coats and I would grab the other. Since by the calculations now, I would get about $270 more a month if I took them back, should I? I have a pretty good relationship with SM and exH and I tolerate each other... things run pretty smoothly.. but this really pissed me off. I mean if I took them back I could have over $3000 more a year to do more with my kids. Better sports equipment for my daughter, private golf lessons for my son, I mean it is a lot of money. But is it worth the fight that my come of it?

My SO thinks I should but I think that is because his ex takes him for every dime she can at every turn around...

Comments

nengooseus's picture

I wouldn't, but that's me. But I'd be super tempted.

It would cost me at least $3k for the court case, so I'd lose regardless.

justmakingthebest's picture

Nope, CS is just a calculator. No need for a lawyer. Straight up pay stubs and that is all there is to it for us!

lieutenant_dad's picture

Did he get a say in whether DD plays softball, or did you just tell him it was that much? Having been on the side of BM signing the boys up for stuff then telling DH it would cost $X, I could see it being annoying.

However, if you know how much he SHOULD be paying and he's scoffing at paying anything above CS, then I say make sure he is paying the full amount of CS that he should. You don't get to have it both ways; you don't get lower CS AND get out of helping to pay for extras. If it's too expensive, then you shouldn't have had more children.

Seriously, I don't like that $1,000 leaves my house every month, but it's DH's responsibility to pay it. I don't like all the extras that he pays for (that he shouldn't have to, but I digress), but it's his responsibility. If we have a child together, I know full well that his obligations to the boys won't decrease. Sure, they may get more clearance items or less expensive stuff, but I would never expect DH to pay less of his obligation. I would expect one or both of us to get another job if needed.

So, if he doesn't want to help above CS, then make him pay the full amount as soon as you're allowed to modify. Having another kid shouldn't mean less for your kids; it should mean he has to work harder or plan smarter so all his kids have the lifestyle he wants them to have.

ProbablyAlreadyInsane's picture

Don’t do it just to be spiteful because of our DH’s ex being psycho.... That being said, if money is SUPER tight I might consider it for thegood of the kids. If it’s not, then you allowed CS to lower.... You can’t count on others for finances... DH’s ex funds ZERO percent of things for the girls (actually I do most of the funding as the third party. Lol) and money is tight, but we doubt we’d get it anyways, and we don’t want her to have that hold over the girls (abusive and on drugs, we minimize contact for their good... Not that she has interest anyways). We want them to be happy, and being happy doesn’t involve the ex’s money all the time.

I agree your ex should be helping support the kids, but weigh any possible court costs, or anything else before you give it a try. Good luck!

MoominMama's picture

So you did something decent accepting less CS hoping that it would give you more leeway and bon homie with the ex and partner... I wish life in stepland went that way. I wouldn't have done that personally (agree with Peanut) as i'm now very cynical after almost 10 years of steps and crazy BM. If your ex cannot be more accomodating and seeing that he knew he would be getting a raise then I think I might consider taking him back to court if I were in your shoes.

bananaseedo's picture

To me it depends on how much he's paying already honestly. I was a dumb ass- I never asked to modify- the CS was $500 for two sons- we upped it to $600 when my son started private school but when he stopped ex continued paying $600- Never paid his half of unpaid medical (I cover insurance), braces, summer camp, any sports.

Sweet T's picture

I got the impression that op asked for a little extra help on softball because she did ex a favor on the cs.

I do not agree in not think that a parent lwho has full legal custody should not get any supg by vport. What you should get the privledge of doing all the hard work of raising a kid and pay for it as well. That seems fair...not.

Not every parent male or female wants or is capable of having 50/50 custody.

At one time my child's portion of health insurance was 300.00. Then there was before and after school daycare for like 450, and in the summer it was 725 a month. What I get from my ex doesn't come near half that.

I think I would just point out to ex that you cut him a pretty good deal and if he wants you can have the stat do a review or you can come to a formal agreement and have it notorized.

momof3smof2's picture

I would have a conversation with him and show him the numbers. Tell him that you are accepting of the child support, as it, but at times may ask for his assistance with extras. Maybe even agree to a yearly cap on extras. If he's not agreeable to that, then go back and have the child support amount corrected.

As a note, I do think you should be required to pay a portion of the summer camp (if it's like daycare), just as he should be required to pay a portion of any daycare during your time.

justmakingthebest's picture

They don't do summer camp here, I am very lucky and have a sister who is a teacher who helps me with them in the summers to keep them busy. Where they live (4 hrs away) they will do a couple of days a week camp for daycare purposes. They don't need it, they can stay home, but they get bored. I allow the cost in the calculators because it is the right thing to do and my kids enjoy it.

Disneyfan's picture

Since he is playing games, I say go back to court. Accept the amount that is ordered, do not ask for extras and request a review every 3 years(or however often your state allows).

Your ex should learn a lesson from this. Play silly games,win silly prizes.

NoWireCoatHangarsEVER's picture

I would ask for an adjustment. You tried to be thoughtful and nice. He isn't giving you the same courtesy. Let a court decide what is fair

momof3smof2's picture

The more I think about this, I've changed my mind. He took a cut in child support KNOWING that he was about to get a significant increase in income. Screw him, go for the increase.

But, I still think you should pay your portion of summer childcare.

momof3smof2's picture

My husband and I pay above and beyond for his kids anytime it is needed, so I'm not the person to be asking those questions of.

lieutenant_dad's picture

I'd 100% agree with you if he were paying 100% of the state calculated CS.

However, he asked for a monthly decrease because he had another kid. Not because he lost his job or his wife got sick or something unexpected. He and his wife planned something that would cost them money, and he hoped it would result in OP agreeing to lower CS to make his decision more affordable. He luckily got OP to agree. I would assume, as a reasonable human being, that if my ex gave me a $1,200 decrease in CS every year but asked for $100 every 4 months that I should probably give it and be grateful for the extra $800 in my pocket that should be going to the care of my first two kids.

I will also agree that he didn't know for certain that he would get the promotion. However, now that he has gotten it, it seems awfully dastardly to not pay $95. My DH's CS went up about $300/mo when he got a $20,000 promotion and BM started working FT. So, doing not-so-reliable math and OP not getting a big pay increase either, let's assume he got a $10,000/yr bump. Assuming $7,500 is take-home, you're telling me he can't spring $95 for his DD's softball? Even if OP took him back to court, he'd still be bringing home nearly $4,000 more a year. And he can't spring $95 for his DD's softball?!

I do get your sentiment of OP should have communicated her expectations more clearly, and that she should be careful about asking above and beyond CS for things that should be covered by CS (ie clothes). However, this man just got handed (with bad math) $7,500 more per year AFTER asking for a reduction in CS and is STILL bellyaching that it's too much.

And I'm not a BM. I am strictly a SM, but even I find this to be hokey. When DH got his raise, I knew a portion of it would be used to benefit the boys, as it should. No, I wouldn't be happy if BM sprang an extra curricular out of nowhere, but if it was literally the only extra thing asked for in 4 months and DH had both reduced CS and gotten a raise, I'd be pretty disappointed that he wouldn't pay for something for his own kids.

justmakingthebest's picture

You know about rank about a year in advance. He knew and carefully planned the whole thing. I was being nice and he manipulated me.

Ninji's picture

If he is military, he knew. You get a line number. That tells you when during the next year you will be promoted. At least with the Air Force. You test at least a year before you are promoted. He knew.

ndc's picture

I think steprightoff has a good point - your ex and his wife deserve to know with some certainty what they're going to have to give you each month so they can plan their own household expenditures accordingly. I think it was nice of you to settle for less than what you might have been entitled, but it probably makes sense to just get the statutory amount (per the state calculator) and let your ex have a definite number, rather than thinking he has a particular obligation and then having to pony up for "extras." (Even though he'd make out better with the status quo). That said, I'd go back for a modification if possible. It wasn't very straightforward of your ex to go for a reduction just before he was getting a pay raise, so I wouldn't waste any time making sure that you are getting the appropriate amount to which you're entitled taking that raise into consideration. Once you're receiving that amount, I wouldn't ask for extras.

BethAnne's picture

There is much less to argue about if you just do everything by the book and be upfront about it. Get the cs that is owed to you in full. Do not ask for extras.

Just tell the ex that you tried to be accommodating but that you found that your budget really didn’t stretch to the reduced amount as you thought it would and that you would rather go by the state calculator than have to ask him for extras and that way you both have predictability too.

I also agree with the poster above that if you wanted extras to be covered occasionally you should have explicitly agreed that with the ex when you took the cut in child support.

justmakingthebest's picture

Wow... not even the case. So in the 9 months since it has been lowered I have officially asked for 1 winter coat and now one season of softball. Keep in mind I am paying the Golf lessons for the other kid!

Rags's picture

Absolutely file for an amendment of CS .... if you can. Often once there is a new CS order it cannot be reviewed for ~2yrs unless there is a notable change of circumtances. His promotion and raise may qualify as qualifying change of circumstance.... so file.

My opinion is that a CP's responsibility is to protect and advance the best interests of the kid(s) and that includes procuring an equity share of the NCP's resources for the benefit of the kid(s).

So, go protect your child's best interests... particularly from someone who is trying to rip your kid off. Screw keeping peace with the X and his wife. Not your problem. Hold them to the CO and go for increases on a regular basis as events unfold.

IMHO of course.

Good luck.

beebeel's picture

"So anyway the date comes, I agree to let him count summer camp (which he shouldn't get to count by our county standards since I have sole physical- we aren't joint physical). Then I agree to letting it lower a little more for a reduction of about $100. TOTALLY VOLUNTARY trying to keep peace with him and his wife."

This part is confusing. If he "shouldn't get to" count summer camp costs, I'm guessing it is because he doesn't have to help pay them. So you aren't really being awesome ex by "letting" him count money he doesn't have to pay. He's being awesome for paying it. You agree to let it lower a little more than what? The reduction he was already owed due to the new CS calculation? Was CS being lowered anyhow, and you just rounded out the figure? And what "peace" were you trying to keep? I thought everyone got along. :?

lieutenant_dad's picture

Summer camp could have been outlined in the CO as his cost due to whatever reason they decided. Or it may be something he wants them to participate in so he has been paying for it "above and beyond" on his own accord. It may not be that he's being "awesome" so much as he wants or has to do it per CO.

justmakingthebest's picture

So in my state, since he has the kids less than 90 days over the course of the year, he doesn't get to count additional child care expenses. They go to him (4 hrs away) for 6 weeks in the summer. He, by our calculators in my state, doesn't get to count that expense. That is wrong, I don't agree. Summer day camps where he lives are expensive and he sends them to camps that they enjoy. It is better for them to go and not spend the summer bored, in front of the tv at home. So I allow the deduction. It is the right thing to do.

beebeel's picture

Thank you for explaining the summer camp costs. The rest is still confusing. How much does he pay in CS now? What lowered it in the first place?

I'm not a big fan that CS goes up anytime the NCP makes a promotion or takes a better job. Why can't Dad decide how to spend his extra money on his kids? No, he may not decide to spend it on sports fees. He may decide to give them more while they are with him, you know, so they can actually enjoy his achievement together instead of passing it through you where he gets no enjoyment and even less credit.

justmakingthebest's picture

Which is why I agreed to it being lowered to begin with, just thought it was pretty shady that he requested it be lowered (it wouldn't have been if I didn't agree) and then got his raise the next month or 2 after- Which he would have known about months and months prior to the request.

beebeel's picture

It seems like you are proposefully ignoring my questions?

You have no idea when he found out about his rank. It doesn't always work the way you think it does.

And just because you agreed to the new amount before it went to the judge doesn't mean the judge wouldn't have lowered it anyway.

How much CS does he pay?

Disneyfan's picture

"I'm not a big fan that CS goes up anytime the NCP makes a promotion or takes a better job."

Are you a fan of CS decreasing when the CP gets a promotion or a better job?

When I moved from NC back to NYC, my income soared(I love my union). My son's dad and I had CS reviewed every 3 years. Each review resulted in CS being lowered due to MY income. His dad was ordered to provide health care, but never had to because I was able to get free family health and dental.(I love my union)

beebeel's picture

That doesn't seem quite fair, does it? I don't know the solution, but I think CS is too closely tied to income rather than costs. It allows some NCPs to be underemployed to skirt obligations and some CPs to never bother to improve their income, but instead ride along on their ex's achievements.

Disneyfan's picture

I think it was fair.

When we all lived on NYC, he earned much more than I did. As a result, he was expected to contribute more financially than I did. Once the tables turned, I contributed more.

BethAnne's picture

If people choose to deliberately short change themselves and their kids by not working or holding back their career just to spite their ex then they are shooting themselves in the foot in the long run. I’d say that’s fair.

mommadukes2015's picture

As the receiving SM on many of these convos which I have with BM2 I appreciate her coming to me with stuff like that. If we have it I'm glad to help-I paid her out all at once for November so she could do Black Friday shopping because we had it (we do weekly installments normally) and SO paid me back. But at the same time, leave it open for her to bow out. Sometimes I don't want to be in the middle-like when BM2 calls with an $1800 overdue after school care bill that she should have been paying all along with at least SOME of the CS she was getting. She called and wanted SO go front 1800 immediately. That stuff pisses me off, but if there is really something reasonable SD needs and we have the extra cash I am more than happy to help make it happen or talk to SO about it. Because 90% of the time they just fight about it.

still learning's picture

There's no reason to play doormat to him. I was nice to exH regarding CS and it did me no favors. If he refuses to pay for softball then I would have it adjusted. There should be give and take not just taking on his part.

Acratopotes's picture

Every time I read about some one who wants more money so that their child can go to private school, have private golf lessons or what ever I get angry....

You divorced this man, you are not entitled to anything after divorce, CS is there for living cost, not for private anything, you agreed to reduce it, WHY?? It's his children as well and he should be paying for their academic education, health and living.... nothing else IMHO

Your current SO has no say in the matter unless he pays for your children's basic living conditions, if not, he can keep his mouth shut.

I'm sorry if I sound harsh, but I'm a BM as well, and I never expected my son's father to spoil him, there's nothing wrong with telling a kid, sorry kiddo I can't afford this or that, mine grew up normal, nothing wrong with the lazy bugger and he knows money does not grow on treas, he never blamed me cause he did not have brand cloths, posh smart phone, playstations, xboxes, nope today as an adult he tells me, Thank you mum, you taught me valuable life lessons and I had allot of love not materialistic things... I look at my friends and they are all spoiled little brats, they will never be able to live the way I'm living...

justmakingthebest's picture

So by what you said above, I should go back for the increased CS of essentially $270/ month vs. 2-3 times a year asking for a hand of something well under $100? Because that is what the kids are entitled to?

That makes no sense and makes me feel like an ass.

I agree with another poster above that guidelines should have been set as to what he will pay for and how often but this was discussed. In the office with DCSE in there. She (DCSE worker) thought we were just the picture of perfection doing what was best for the kids and the 2 households. However if I am going to be viewed as a piece of crap because I asked for something small, right after Christmas, right before one of their birthdays and right when both sport dues are due- well then screw it I might as well take him for every dime in CS I can! I could use the extra money! Maybe I will be one of those cool BM's with my nails did and my hair all fancy all the time. :sick:

Acratopotes's picture

life is not a popularity contest, go to court, let them determine CS and annual increases and stick to it.

Then use the money for what it's paid for, your children ... this will not make you an ass and you should not feel like one either,
you did not make those children all on your own,.....

but what I'm saying... if you can't afford private gold lessons for a child, it's not a reason to ask for more CS..

Simpleton21's picture

I agree with Acratopotes on this. CS to me is to cover ESSENTIAL costs of living for the child. Food, childcare, shelter, etc. All the other stuff is extra stuff that if you CAN afford it then great and if not OH WELL or whatever you AGREED to! I am a BM and a SM. My SO and I had a child together and as soon as we did BM went for child support (something they agreed SO wouldn't have to pay when they divorced b/c BM made more and SO agreed to pay 1/2 of sports/parties/etc. and BM in our case doesn't pay for daycare of any kind). To me it was a big F U from BM and just another way for her to try to yet again claim that SD was more deserving of SO's money because she was born first. Also, just to note BM was COMPLETELY fine with the arrangement they had for 4 years before I came along. It was only once I got pregnant that she took SO back for support and it really hurt our home financially because costs of a newborn and childcare for a newborn are high. I find it infuriating that people truly think that the children from the first marriage are more important and deserving than the 2nd marriage. My SD is completely spoiled and in numerous sports and is not wanting for anything while we struggle to pay for the added costs of childcare/etc. I know that we made the decision to have another child and we are responsible to support that child. Just like my 1st child from my 1st relationship is just as much my responsibility as my exes. It was also a decision of the 1st family (or whatever you want to call it) to split up.

If OP had told her ex, "yeah, we can reduce the cost but I might need help from time to time with extra costs for xyz" I think it would have been okay. You can't just reduce support and hope that they will decide to contribute more b/c you were nice and made that reduction. Since BM in our case decided to go back for CS the moment I got pregnant we quit helping with parties/sports/etc. because she is getting her monthly CS support and she can use that for those expenses. That was the trade off she decided to make.

My ex used to help pay for 1/2 of my older son's daycare and expenses. I only took him for court ordered CS when he stopped doing so. It wasn't something I wanted to do but when he stopped helping I felt I had to. It wasn't so that I could afford to send him to a private school and private lessons....it was to help pay for the essentials.

twoviewpoints's picture

I "get" it. You are feeling betrayed. Like you got taken and played the fool. Not a good feeling and first thought is 'how dare you, I'll get you back'.

However, you did this to yourself. From what I gathered from your blogs, there are perhaps two new children for your ex with SM? One pretty quickly when they first got together and (it sounds like) one maybe recently? Even though SM and you have become friends, you made the mistake that she would somehow always put your children before her own.

You voluntarily reduced your CS. You voluntarily accepted summer camp while at Dad's would be credited in calculations. But why on earth did you then assume a man begging for a monthly reduction would turn around and suddenly start helping pay for extras he'd not been paying for before? Wanting more monthly cash in their household budget was the point of him requesting the monthly CS reduction in the first place.

Most parents work out the support and what over support will be split along with agreements on extra curricular activities when they divorce and the CO/PP is drawn up. Golf is not a need. It's a childhood experience that many children never get to participate in because their parents can't afford it. It's not a birthright. Daycare, winter coats, food, medical care splits, all those mundane requirements aka needs take priority. All the rest is extra.

When you asked for a coat for one kid and paid for a coat for the other kid, your ex came through and shared the expense. But when you asked, right after Christmas with a kid birthday approaching for a sport fee? Well, Dad just had Christmas too and he's got an approaching birthday for a kid too. You've got two kids, he has at least three if not four kids. You voluntarily handed the man a CS reduction AND have nothing in a CO about splitting extra curricular activities.

You kind cooked your own goose on this. Sure, you can now run back as soon as timeframe allows another CS review and ask for an increase or try to fight the current reduction you voluntarily agreed to saying it was under false pretentions. It'd be about $170 or so, right? After you get back the $100 you voluntarily gave up and a new $170 (his rank increase) for a total of $270.

Only you can decide what your next move is going to be. Just keep in mind that your kids have an involved father, you have little conflict going on between households and no one made you give him a reduction in the first place... so is $170 a month worth rocking the boat to get private golf lessons? To have resentment build between households? To have Dad perhaps decide he can't afford to send your kids to camp this summer and decides instead to let your kids sit around bored all summer for six weeks?

You'll not see me write poorly of a CP who fights for what is legally their children's right in the way of being supported by both parents. I fully believe both parents need to support their children and I fully believe a NCP should be paying the standard guideline/law amount along with any other mutually agreed/ordered spilt amounts ... but then I find myself shaking my head as to why you voluntarily gave up what your children were getting.

zerostepdrama's picture

I'd take him back to let the courts decide. And moving forward never do him anymore favors.

zerostepdrama's picture

I'd take him back to let the courts decide. And moving forward never do him anymore favors.

WalkOnBy's picture

I agree with your premise, but word it this way

"I would go back to court and let the numbers speak for themselves. And never deviate from the formula."

DPW's picture

I would also take him back and simply request fair CS going forward. I also would not ask him to pay anything else once CS is adjusted.

secret's picture

You would be within your rights to request an increase in CS due to an increase in his salary.

You can't overspend on extra curriculars and try to make him pay half of what you overspent. Support is to cover the basics, not to cover the extras. Just because you want them, doesn't mean dad has to pay for them. It's up to you to manage the funds you have. If you can't afford it, don't spend it.

ESMOD's picture

I think you fell into a trap that many women fall into. You want to be liked. You wanted your EX and his new wife to "like" you because you feel it would make your life easier. And.. to a certain extent, that is true, but I imagine there is already a resentment in that household for the money that goes to you for his children by you.

Another poster asked whether he was "in" on the agreement that you would take less CS if he would pay for the occasional extra item. While I am not generally in favor of the BM going back to the well when they are already getting CS and asking for extra luxuries (extra curricular things), it seems in this case, you thought asking for less in CS would mean he would kick in for the occasional additional item. So, was he in on the agreement or was this just your logic in agreeing to less?

I might take another look at the formulation and then approach him with the choice of continuing as you are now with very occasional extras... or whether he is up for an additional X amount of CS obligation every month. Right now, you have put yourself in a position of weakness of having to basically ASK him for money that in reality, if you had the correct amount of CS would already be in your hands.

I might do it this way... get an order for the correct amount of CS and then tell him if he is ever "tight" he can ASK YOU if you will accept a lower amount for a month.

twoviewpoints's picture

"I might do it this way... get an order for the correct amount of CS and then tell him if he is ever "tight" he can ASK YOU if you will accept a lower amount for a month."

Which would set the guy right up for being in arrears through the child support distribution center that handles the CS pass-thru.

ESMOD's picture

Not everyone uses those... my DH just paid by check or we deposited directly into BM's account and held the receipt.

If this is the case then he can pay the full CS and if he has a need for extra he can ask her to send him a check back.

Right now, ostensibly, she is not getting the full amount of CS he would owe and is having to ask for any extras. These extras have historically been way below any cummulative CS deficit he is not paying. It's just the dynamic right now makes her the pleading, low power person to get what in reality may be rightfully money that should be going to support her kids.

There is no law that says she has to spend the CS on X,Y or Z. If she is super frugal and a couponer, she may be able to do more extras than a typical CP could with CS but again, if she was getting the full amount that she may be entitled to, then I don't think she should be able to go back to him for extras at that point.

bananaseedo's picture

"Over the summer my ex took me back to court to try and reduce CS because he has another kid. It hadn't been modified in a couple of years, I was no longer paying daycare but he had a substantial pay raise... so whatever. When I looked at it through the state calculator the worst case I could find was a lowered amount of $40/ month and best case was it went up $70. So anyway the date comes, I agree to let him count summer camp (which he shouldn't get to count by our county standards since I have sole physical- we aren't joint physical). Then I agree to letting it lower a little more for a reduction of about $100. TOTALLY VOLUNTARY trying to keep peace with him and his wife."

Ok, so the formula you used said could be $40 less possibly-you let him count summer camp -how generous-you have full physical...but wait you said he has her 6 weeks of summer. I'm sorry but then YES, IMO that amount for summer camp he pays SHOULD be included as his contribution. Summer camp is expensive- I paid it all, my ex never paid extra- since it was included in "CS"- IMO, if HE is the one paying for summer camp because he has them in the summer, he SHOULD get to include that in the support calculation. Anything less would just be you being a greedy BM, sorry.

"About 3 months later I found out he got another rank up in the military- which comes along with hefty pay increases in pay and housing. I didn't take him back for a modification. I was pretty pissed he went in trying for a reduction when he knew he was about to make even more money, but whatever. The way I saw it was if I ever needed them to do anything- like winter coats, new shoes, sports dues for the kids or whatever, as long as they did that, I was cool with it. Not every month making it a thing, but if I was ever tight."

Most modifications are done every 3 years. He's entitled to do w/his raises as he sees fit. It doesn't have to go to you. He had another child and the courts found he would have to pay less CS-a deduction of sorts. Nothing wrong w/that.

"So, I asked this month for them to cover SD's softball dues. $95- he came back stating he already contributed enough to my household. Now keep in mind I haven't asked for a thing since September when I asked them to grab 1 of the kids winter coats and I would grab the other. Since by the calculations now, I would get about $270 more a month if I took them back, should I? I have a pretty good relationship with SM and exH and I tolerate each other... things run pretty smoothly.. but this really pissed me off. I mean if I took them back I could have over $3000 more a year to do more with my kids. Better sports equipment for my daughter, private golf lessons for my son, I mean it is a lot of money. But is it worth the fight that my come of it?"

If he said that-I don't know what he pays but sounds like a decent amount-I find it curious you won't say how much that is. You agreed to that amount, live with it. Go for the mod, but don't be surprised if the courts turn you down since you had one recently.

What is this thing about skids having to do expensive sports all year? I coudlnt' afford it, my kids did some rec basketball for a few years and then that was it, I couldn't afford it, it stopped. Budget better. It seems to me your just offended he's helping support the new child he has w/current wife and somehow that extra raise should only go to you and yours. A new kid costs a LOT OF MONEY- your kids are supported already by both of you right? All in all you took a $100 reduction from what amount exactly? So, you allowed about $60 more then would technically qualify him because you 'allowed' him to include the summer camp he pays, did I get that right?