Ruling of Judge Confused
I am really confused on the ruling the jugde this last family court. DH of waited a little over 6 months to file for more time with SS3 and they both went to mediation of course BM became the victim and requested to be seen separtely because of intimidation (BS) any how they went back was seen separately mediator did not give much hope to DH. How ever when we got the report we were surprised by the recommendation she actually recommended for DH to in crease parenting time to 48% yay!!!
That didnt last too long shortly before court date we got a letter from BM lawyer of course BM disagreed with the recommendation and wanted to cut down parenting time with DH even the sleep overs that we currently have and on top of that she wanted DH to pay for her lawyers fees and everything because DH keeps taking her back to court.Mind she has an attorney does not work is on SSI gets CS from DH. How can she afford an attorney beats me. DH has always been In Pro Per.
To make it short they went to court obviously both parties were not agreeing so the judge told both he will review and in 90 days will send out his judgement. We lost according to him DH had no reason to modify child visitation so it stayed the same. I don't understand the system why do they send you to a mediator in the 1st place disregard completely their recommendation you follow all the rules and regualations and say one does not have a reason where in this judgement is it in the childs best interest. Any advice? :jawdrop: