You are here

Why do so many of you insist on stepping into a role that's already occupied?

not-really-my-thing's picture

As 'hereiam' pointed out, the word "stepparent" is definitely outtdated. It's a middle english term for when one parent dies and another adult steps in. Cinderella et all never had a stepmother and a mother. They had one wicked stepmother. Mothers all dead and gone. That's not the situation most of us find ourselves in. So what does that make us in relation to the children? Their father's wives, as best I can tell.

Perhaps in me, my husband's daughter will see another way to be a woman. Perhaps not. That's not up to me. All I can do is be myself and treat her well. But I do know that she'll never get a replacement mother. She doesn't need one. She has a mother. My husband married me to be his wife, not to be his child's mother. I have a wonderful life with my husband, and when his daughter is here (half the time) she is part of that life. That doesn't mean that I suddenly take on motherly duties. My husband is the parent in our home and he does a fine job.

Seems to me so many of you on this forum make yourselves miserable trying to be a mother to your stepchildren and then you're shocked and hurt when the father starts shirking his duties and the mother comes unglued. Not to be cruel, but what did you expect? You're stepping into a role that's already occupied. Why would do that to yourselves?

Comments

momagainfor4's picture

in a perfect world, I can see where this idea of yours would work out.
But in the imperfect world that we all live in things just aren't this black and white. Society as a whole expects the "new wife" or "so" to behave in a motherly manner toward children that are not her's. I think that this is also a kickback to the whole "stepmom" term.

It would be awesome to break out of this perpetuated ideology. But I don't see it happening anytime soon. Regardless of the term or how it came to be.... it's come to mean something different in today's world.

Pook's picture

I agree with you, momagainfor4. As well, the relationship between the BM and skids could be very rocky or non-existent. In my situation, the BM had many psychological disorders, alcoholism, abusive behaviour (including hitting and screaming at the children) that in so many ways, she was a nightmare for them and not a mother.

I wish BM could have mothered her children. She couldn't. She is incapable. Sometimes a role of motherhood sneaks up on you and the "grey" areas begin to show.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I recognize that when the mother is gone or incapable someone must step in to make sure the child is okay. But it seems that some of you are stepping in when that's not the case. One commenter (Beth, I think?) posted that she's no longer doing this but she used to insert herself into her husband's daughter's life in order to make the mother back away. That's unfortunate, in my opinion. It didn't appear to work very well for anyone, including her, and it didn't seem necessary because from what I can tell, the mother has none of the serious issues you describe.

Kes's picture

I never ever tried to be a mother to my SDs, just to have a cordial relationship with them, while my DH handled the parenting. However, this was stymied by their mother who hated me before she met me, and did everything she could to make her daughters hate me as well. I did not break up their marriage, they were already separated.

If you have a reasonable relationship with your SD, be thankful. Many of us on here are here because our relationships with SKIDs are adversely affected by things out of our control. As Wednesday Martin points out in her book "Stepmonster" - the relationship that the Step parent is able/not able to forge with the SKIDs is largely down to the attitude of the bio parents, whether they encourage and allow a warm relationship to exist between step and child. This was manifestly not the case for me.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Yes I understand that there's so much about this situation that arose before any of us showed up. We have little control. Perhaps that's why I try to keep things simple. Why insert the complexity of my trying to parent a child who already has two parents? And from what I've read I'm wise to stay in the background with the mother. She seems to be a fairly reasonable person but I can imagine how she might change if I suddenly started inserting myself into her child's life unnecessarily. I thinks she and my husband have remained fairly neutral about me in front of their daughter.

BSgoinon's picture

My SS does have a mother. And he has a STEPmother, me. In our home, I am the mother. We are afamily, with a mom and a dad and sisters and a brother. If he needs something that typically a "mother" would do (i.e. mend a pair of shorts, or plan his birthday party) that's me... I do that. When he is with his mom, his mom does that. He does not call me "mom" he has a nickname for me. The kids go to school in our district so I enroll him, I sign him up for baseball, I purchase his school supplies and write his name inside of them. Some of these things I do because I have learned over the past 8 years that if I DON'T do it, it won't get done for him. I also do them because I love him.

At my job, I have a counter part. There are TWO of "me". Just because the occupation is filled doesn't mean their isn't a need for an additional to "pick up the slack".

not-really-my-thing's picture

Why doesn't your husband do those things? He is the child's parent, after all.

BSgoinon's picture

Well for many reasons.... he travels for work for one thing and he simply doesn't have enough hours in the day. And it isn't that he DOESN'T parent. He coaches all three (separate) baseball/ softball teams. This is house our house runs. We BOTH parent ALL of the kids (his son and my daughters). It's what works for us, and has worked for us for eight years. I have a great relationship with my ss he has a great relationship with my girls, and BM doesn't cause much drama (anymore). We function as a family, because we love each other.

My husband has no interest in planning a birthday party. He doesn't know how to mend clothes, he doesn't have the patience to help with homework... he doesn't have the skills to do their hair in the morning or the time to help them pick out their clothes. Those "mom" things are done by ME in our house, and those "dad" things... are done by HIM.

This step parenting thing may "not be your thing" but it is mine. I enjoy having a blended family. It works for us.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I'm glad it's working for you, that's really lovely. What I was commenting on is the women who attempt to do what you do and find themselves with an uninvolved husband and an irate mother.

BSgoinon's picture

My mistake, I misunderstood your angle on the OP.

I don't understand why a woman would make herself misrable like that either. I don't think I would stick around for that.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I understand that society has its own expectations. Frankly, I don't really respond much to abstract ideology. I respond to the day-to-day of my own home. I listen to my husband and how he thinks his daughter is doing. If they're both happy and I'm happy then we're good. Behaving in a "motherly manner," what does that mean exactly? I support my husband's role as a parent and treat his child kindly. His daughter has a nice home and plenty of healthy food and does her homework and has lots of little friends. I'm part of making that life possible for her because I've built this home with her father. But I don't tuck her in or remind her to brush her teeth or make her lunch or meet with her teacher. Those are things a parent does and she has her father when she is here. When she is with her mother, her mother does those things. I don't see much use in my elbowing my way in to create a role for myself that's not necessary.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I'm genuinely curious because I see a lot of suffering here. It's well-intentioned but nonetheless self-created suffering. I'm not interested in abstractions, I'm interested in the day-to-day realities of how this situation works for different people. I'm glad many of you have responded in that vein.

Willow2010's picture

I agree with you. I always describe myself as the “nice Aunt” type. I think you were the cool Aunt right?

SS has a mother; I was never a “step mother” to SS, even when he lived with us. I was nice and never mean, but I had my own kids to raise and SS was DH’s responsibility.

I think at first a lot of us jump in to be better than BM. IT WILL NEVER WORK. She will always be mom.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Your comment makes me wonder if it's easier for women with their own children to resist stepping into the mother role with their husband's children. I have no children of my own. But thank god I feel no urge to force upon this child my own need to be a mother. If my husband and I do have a child together I'm confident I would be a fine mother. But not to his daughter. She has a mother. And as you say, "she will always be mom."

just tired's picture

^^^ On what do you base this confidence that you will be a fine mother? Haven't you stated in one of your other posts that you don't think you have maternal instincts?

not-really-my-thing's picture

Haven't many of you stated that your own maternal instincts are present with your own children in a way they are not with your husband's children? That's why I am confident I would be a fine mother. Not a fantastic mother, but just fine.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I am sorry if I've misrepresented my position. I know it's not perfect. I keep saying it's "easy" not as a badge of honor but to acknowledge that I am humbled by what many of you here face every day. I'm saying that I know I don't have much to deal with but it's enough to bring me here looking for help, same as you. Despite first impressions here to the contrary, I do consider myself a compassionate person. But you're right, my compassion hasn't (yet) been required with my husband's daughter. She seems to be a happy, content child and my husband has an amical relationship with his former wife. It's those things that have led me here. Because if my situation is so easy, why do I feel uneasy? Why do I not like this child? Why do I not feel I can be myself in my own home? Those are all things that I've shared here but it seems few have listened. Just because my delivery is calm doesn't mean I'm not struggling.

just tired's picture

I am genuinely sorry you are struggling. Your situation may not be as difficult as some of ours (at least not yet), but you are struggling...and that's what matters to you.

Your first flurry of posts may have ruffled feathers, but it seems you have openly & sincerely "heard" what others were saying to you about your tone, etc.

My suggestion is that you try a fresh start here. Introduce yourself, talk about what you are struggling with, and see what responses you get.

Welcome here!

Lola383's picture

I definitely don't try to be a motherly figure to my BF's kids. For one reason, I feel like I'm too young to be a parent figure to a 17 and almost 11 year old. Thanks to this blog, I do a lot of the disengaging thing to avoid getting caught up in parental drama. It really does save my sanity! (Thank you!! Wink ) I can't be too sure, but I would suspect that no one is looking in on our relationship and expecting me to act like a second mother to his kids. they do have their mother. I'm just Dad's GF that lives with them. I don't know if that changes if/when we marry. But I dunno, I kinda side with not-really-my-thing on trying to take on a role that's already filled. And of course every circumstance is different. I think disengaging is the closest thing we can get to in that perfect world.

Now in my situation, i think my BF would LOVE it if I acted motherly towards his kids. But that's an unrealistic expectation. I've been around his kids for over a year now and can't really say that I even love them. i care about them a lot of course but do I love them as my own? heck no. The oldest is at best like a little sister to me and I have cousins that are the same age as my BF's youngest. No where in there is a mother-child relationship and I would never dream of trying to infringe upon BM's relationship with her kids. I have no need to and I don't personally feel any pressure from society to act that way.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Comforting a hurt child isn't "mothering" it's being a decent human being. Of course I would and have done that with my husband's daughter. But I think another commenter said it well: I have no desire to "shape" this child. That's what her parents are for. She abides by the rules of our home when she's here and she lives her life seemingly quite content. That's enough for me, and most importantly, that's enough for my husband.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Sounds like we are similar in some ways. But I never wanted to step in with my husband or his daughter and change the way they do things. Maybe I just got lucky and entered into a situation with a sane parent and a compliant child. I have no urge to shape this child. She is a friendly stranger to me, and that's fine.

steppingsucks's picture

I kind of disagree not-really-my-thing. I think that most step-parents have a problem with their DH *assuming* that we will take over the role of mother in the house over their kids, which obviously causes a lot of problems.

Yes, at first, I assumed that we'd treat all of the kids the same in our house. But when it became apparent to me that this wasn't going to happen, I stepped back and disengaged. Not my kid, not my problem. DH doesn't like it to this day, but it's the only way for me to remain healthy and sane while being a good parent to my bio-kids.

So to me, the real issue are the DH's out there having completely unrealistic expectations of us as step-parents, and the chaos that occurs as a result of those expectations.

It should be simple. Unless one parent is dead, the step-kid has two bio-parents. Those parents should be responsible for how that kid turns out, good or bad. That's it.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Sounds like we're in complete agreement: "It should be simple. Unless one parent is dead, the step-kid has two bio-parents. Those parents should be responsible for how that kid turns out, good or bad. That's it." I do understand that the father holds the key in most situations. I can imagine the chaos that ensues if he expects his new wife to parent his children. At the risk of sounding too simplistic, why does she comply? What if she simply refused to do those things that are her husband's duties as a father? Would they not get done? Perhaps. Would they not get done without her in the picture? Perhaps. Seems to me that in most cases the husband would rise to the occasion and find a way to take care of his fatherly duties if he had to.

Pook's picture

I am wondering why you are on this site, NotReallyMyThing. It just seems you have your parameters set and that is very cool and very good for you.

However, you are also being somewhat belittling to the people on here who are having a difficult time with things. If you are in a good and secure place with your DH and your skids, is it necessary to mock women who are struggling?

not-really-my-thing's picture

My intention is not to mock or belittle. I'm so sorry if I came across that way. I have no idea what I'm doing. I have no idea whether I'm in a "good and secure place." Only time will tell. I have my own struggles with this, which is why I am here. I just wanted to know why women insert themselves in a mother role with their husband's children when from what I can tell from my reading here, so many of them suffer greatly for it. Most of my reading so far has made me furious at the fathers, to be candid. I didn't expect that.

StickAFork's picture

I don't think you're mocking anyone.

I got the gist of your post as being, "why are those of you who are miserable ALLOWING yourselves to be miserable?"
I kinda agree.
I think a lot of times women are total control freaks, come into a new situation, and think they can do it all "better." Or...sometimes, they just don't have the backbone to tell their husbands to man up and handle their business!

not-really-my-thing's picture

Thank you, I truly don't mean to kick anyone when they're down. I realize how many complicated factors there are. Society expects women to somehow naturally love all children, their own and otherwise. Men shirk their duties as a father and assume women will care for their children. Women are competitive with one another. I believe in many situations we can make this simpler and easier on ourselves: when our husband's child has a mother, leave the parenting to the parents.

stormabruin's picture

I agree that there are situations where this applies. I see many SM's stepping on toes while trying to play the "mother" role, but I do think there are situations (an absent or an involved-when-it's-convenient BM) that pull a SM into more of a mother-figure role.

I see SM's trodding on BM's feet when she's able for the sake of giving BM what she "deserves". I see SM's innocently overstepping, just because we're all new to this at some point & need to learn where the boundaries are. Some are eager to play "mother". Some are just trying to be involved because they love the kids & want to do what they can for them.

There's no "How-to" manual for being a good stepmom. We just need to find the place we fit in best. Are we willing to offer what's needed from us? Do we feel like we need a situation that allows us to be more active? We need to recognize the importance of functioning in that place, & decide whether or not it's a place we can feel happy being in. If it is, great! If not, maybe we need to re-evaluate & find a situation that better suits us.

In our situation, BM was absent for the first 2-3 years I knew my DH & his kids. It required more involvement on my part that I was happy to provide. Our situation has changed. We are NCP now. BM is active & present, so less is required of me.

Do I feel like she's a good mom? No
Do I feel like I could do better? Absolutely
Do I take it upon myself to prove it? Absolutely not.

It isn't because I don't love Dh's kids or want more for them. It's because I'd be crossing boundaries & creating more problems for myself, my DH, & his kids if I did.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Very well said. I can imagine it's complicated to step in because it truly was required of you and then step back. It appears I have rubbed people the wrong way when I didn't mean to. I realize that each of you faces pressures specific to your situation. I realize that society expects all women to somehow naturally want to take care of children, theirs or otherwise. I think you've said what I'm trying to get at: that crossing these boundaries, when there is a mother present, creates more problems.

stormabruin's picture

It was a difficult adjustment to make, but being hard didn't make it less necessary. Not to mention, had I not been willing to step back & let BM be BM, I would've been creating more difficulty & misery for myself & everyone else involved.

There's a lot to be said for looking at a situation & being willing to put forth the effort, suck up the sourness...whatever we need to do. I think a lot of us could resolve a lot of our anger & frustration if we were more willing to take a step back & fix what we can fix for ourselves. We could make many lives (our own included) much more pleasant, peaceful, & happier.

Willow2010's picture

Pook...I don't see her as belittling at all. I wonder the same thing myself. I think she brings a fresh, welcome view, on step parenting.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Why thank you. I truly didn't mean to offend. I don't know if my view is "fresh" but I do know that I'm taking it all in from a distance.

Fading's picture

I don't really consider myself a 'stepmom' even though that is what SD and BM usually refer to me as. Although I have somehow been sucked in recent years to play the adult in situations where BM would call distraught, not knowing how to parent or discipline her own kid or when DH pussyfoots around and will sometimes be an amazing parent and sometimes he throws on his daddygoggles and forgets how mentally ill his daughter is and how much structure and discipline she DOES need (please read my previous blogs to understand the 'mentally ill' part). I usually try to keep to myself and focus solely on our marriage, only interfering when SD's shenanigans are harming me or my animals or possessions. I wouldn't ever want anyone to think I raised SD, it'd only make me feel shame. When the days come that SD needs a prom dress or a wedding dress or her first date (if she doesn't kill him before the date starts) or whatever, that is all up to her mother to deal with. I am just a bystander that sometimes has to step in when my rights and property is being damaged or harmed.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I'm sorry to hear you're dealing with a mentally ill child. It's difficult for us to know what to call ourselves, isn't it? I feel the same way. I believe I am a bystander in many ways, as well, in a very positive way. Someone who is a neutral presence but is here to help when needed.

not-really-my-thing's picture

You're very honest about your situation. It seems you're not alone, and as I said before what I didn't expect in reading here is to be so furious at so many of these fathers. It was their choice to bring these children into the world. The divorce from the children's mother does nothing to diminish their duties as a father. Their remarriage does nothing to diminish their duties as a father. As you say, if your significant other weren't with you, he would have to find a way to care for his children.

herewegoagain's picture

I agree. But note, that although I SOMETIMES refer to loser as SKID, I normally refer to her as my husband's daughter. I have never once tried to replace her mother, override her mother or anything similar. It was THE MOTHER and FAMILY that expected ME to take care of her as a mother, which I constantly refused to do. Because I didn't, then they treated me like crap because I would not treat her as a daughter...so sometimes, you can't win.

not-really-my-thing's picture

That's unfortunate. I'm assuming that your husband wasn't able to protect you from his family? I don't mean to touch on a raw nerve. It astonishes me how responsible the husbands/fathers are for much of the mess.

Unfreakingreal's picture

Not only are they responsible for the mess but than they are CLUELESS about what role THEY played in creating these situations. It is what is happening in MY home now. He has no idea how much resentment I am harboring and how much of it is completely HIS doing.

Unfreakingreal's picture

Lots to take in here. I am a Bio and a SM. Lately, and I mean VERY recently, I have been questioning the WHY I insist on "mothering" these kids that are NOT mine. If I were to be completely honest I'd have to say that #1 - it was ME trying to show DH and Skids that THIS is what a REAL mother behaves like. So yes, a part of it was me trying to outdo the BM. She's a hot mess.
#2 - I genuinely liked the Skids. They have always been pretty good kids. Have never in 12 years been disrespectful to me. But lately, things have begun to shift in our home.
I think my DHs lack of parenting has begun to tick me off. At first I was all gung ho about being in charge, Now, not so much. DH doesn't set rules, regulations, curfews, expectations. NOTHING. At the end of the day, why do I care if these kids fail in life? They aren't mine. They DO have a mother and despite her always being a shitty mother, her kids adore her, so all that effort and energy that I put into those kids, I have started to slowly pull back.
Just this morning DH called me at work to ask if I had ordered his daughters birthday present. I said NO. I know he was very stunned, because usually I am the one that handles all that. Today, he had to handle it on his own. And I don't feel the least bit shitty about it either. Fuck em...

lawyergirl06's picture

I think it really depends on your situation. I think it's easy for women who already have children because the expectation for all children in the home should be the same. We all hear, all the time, from all the experts and non-experts, that consistency is key. So if you have children that live with you full time, and then you have SKIDS who don't, it's really confusing if the rules ar different for your children. At least that is some of the impression I get from some of the things I read, and to those women, I say God Bless You, because honestly, parenting is hard enough when there is one set of rules and if DH isn't going to step in and do the rules someone has to in order to maintain a good structure for the bios.

For some women, I do think there is a nurturing and mothering side that comes out and there is a natural inclination to want to parent or comfort or however you want to define it. Some women I think want to provide a good role model when there may not be another to do that. Some women want the children to be comfortable in both homes because honestly, the kids have no control over the changes in their lives and as adults there is, at least on some level, responsibility for all adults involved to try to make some of that transition easier (does not mean you have to kill yourself doing it for shit SKIDS...don't get me wrong) and for a lot of women, from what I have been reading, it's an adjustment because this is new for them and they have never been a SM before (myself included) in which case they are learning by doing.

In my case it's several things. One, I love the SO and I love the kids. I can't help it. They are, for the most part, great kids who have been through a lot and are clearly older than their age (and that's not me saying it, that's everyone I have encountered including my own family). For two, they got a shit deal from the BM side of the equation and that is absolutely not their fault, and they deserve to have at least one mothering figure in their life who is willing to force them to eat peas and say please and thank you. Three, my SO has four kids; works full time as I do, and deals with crazy BM. I don't have to deal with her, but it's terribly overwhelming for him. And we see ourselves as a team so we back each other up. It would be hard for me to be a team member if I refused to play. That is entirely my opinion and not a criticism of those who have chosen to disengage because after a few months on here I can see why several do, and support them wholeheartedly. Four, I spent the better part of my career working with kids in the juvenile system who had shit lives and shit parents. I can see what impact that has on children. I know you can do everything right and still screw up a kid, but if that happens then that is fate. If I choose to be a part of these kids' lives then I have a duty to try my best to make sure they don't end up worse off then they are already. And finally, I love them. I do. Totally and completely. I know it will be different when I have my own, but I don't and right now I can't imagine loving anything as fiercely as I do these kids. So for me, I don't have a choice, it's important for me to be a part of their lives, to offer my guidance and my experience and to learn with them daily what it means to be a parent. But that's my experience, it's different and completely unrelated to anyone else's. I am lucky so far, they are good kids who love me. There may come a day when I decide to homicide all of them, but for now, I will keep them around. Smile

not-really-my-thing's picture

You're quite clear and articulate about your position and it seems to be working for all involved. Bravo! I agree completely when you say, "I want the children to be comfortable in both homes because honestly, the kids have no control over the changes in their lives." Absolutely. From my perspective, helping my husband's daughter be comfortable means letting her know what we're glad when she's here, letting her see that her father's love for me doesn't interfere with his fatherly care of her, and making it clear that I'm in no way competing with her mother. I'm a new and completely different kind of adult in her life.

newbiemommy's picture

I wish that were the case. Even in the beginning I was firm about these are YOUR kids and your responsibility. But what can i do when that "emergency" situation he needs me to babysit becomes and every day thing. When he asked me to "help" him with this and that and now it's expected. When I woke him up to take care of his kids last week it turned into a knock down drag out fight because "we are supposed to be a team". I do not want to parent these children in ANY way, they have two capable parents. But there was no one around to warn me, there was no one telling me what my life dating a guy with kids would turn into. Trust me, I don't want to be a step parent. But when both of those parents are leaving their child up to me what am I supposed to do? I either leave or continue on with what I allowed to happen. My SD11s BM expects so much because "that's what a step parent should do" and no matter what I've said or tried to do and not do, here I am.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I'm not implying that it's easy, I know it's complicated. But what if you just said, "no"? Calmly and without any heat. Just "no." And then leave to do your own thing. You did not choose to bring these children into the world. Their mother and father did. You chose to be your husband's wife. Being a team is about building a healthy marriage, not about your taking on his role as a parent. That's the way I see it, anyway.

lawyergirl06's picture

I agree about the healthy marriage thing too. SO has always taken the position that no matter what happens, if we get married, our marriage will come first, then the kids. It sounds harsh when said out loud but I am proud of him for recognizing that. It makes it a lot easier to support and help him as well with the kids. I think there are a lot of people who don't have that.

Unfreakingreal's picture

Someone else made a good point. That when you have your own kids and then there is a Skid also in the home, it sets a bad precedent to have TWO sets of rules.
So for example - in our home, we have 2 of MY Bios and 1 SS. We get SD EOW. My bio's have rules that are implemented by ME. I expect these rules to be followed. I feel it is wrong that SS can do as he pleases while my boys have to obey my rules. So therein lies a dilemma. I have decided that I will no longer care if SS does as he pleases, because he is not my child and if his dad wont lay down the law that will be on him. I will continue to parent MY children and let his run free like animals. At the end of the day, MY kids will be productive members of society. What happens with his is no longer my concern. Thanks for posting this blog because it has given me lots to digest.

B22S22's picture

^^^ ditto to this, to a point.

I don't know which is more difficult -- not being a bioparent and marrying someone with a child, or already being a parent and trying to blend a family. I think each has it's own set of challenges.

For me (already a bioparent marrying a NCP), what Unfreakingreal said fits us to a "T". I have pretty clear guidelines and expectations for my kids and we've managed just fine. And DH is onboard with those expectations for my kids in this house... but then his kids come here on their weekend (EVERY weekend) and the rules DH is all gung-ho about with my kids don't seem to apply to his kids.

As an adult, I can step back and say exactly what Unfreakingreal said about my kids growing up to be productive, sane, logical, respectful adults and my DH's kids won't. The difficulty comes when trying to explain to my kids why.

I also think (IMHO) that it's difficult to parent in an environment like that. I don't like to see my kid called out on something, then watch his kid turn around and do the very same thing with no consequences. And that's exactly what happens -- SK's figured out early on that they could do as they pleased and I won't say anything because they're not my kids. DH won't say anything because, well, he doesn't want them mad at him.

And all the while I'm trying to parent my kids in this chaos, my DH is wanting to be "one big happy family" and act like we're the Brady Bunch. Meanwhile, his kids openly refer to me as a "bitch" to my kids, they refuse to speak to me, ignore me when I do speak to them, and basically act as though I'm nothing but an inconvenience in this house (MY house).

So...... by the simple act of marrying my DH, this is what my life has come to. I never once fooled myself into thinking I could be a "mom" to them, as I too am of the opinion that the SK's have two parents, they don't need more. But when it comes down to others trying to impose the "open your heart, your home, and your WALLET, but keep your damned mouth shut" thing on me, I struggle.

not-really-my-thing's picture

I think your situation, having children of your own and marrying a man with children, sounds the most difficult of all for the reasons you mention. I've read that my situation, having no children of my own and marrying a man with children, is the most difficult but I honestly can't see why that would be. You're dealing with so many more moving parts, so many more challenges.

Unfreakingreal's picture

B22S22, I completely get it sister! I deal with this shit on a daily basis! I have just very recently decided to disengage. Like literally a few days ago. We'll see what comes of it. In the meantime, I will continue to try and be the best mom I can be to MY kids. Whatever happens with HIS kids will be HIS problem.

tweetybird74's picture

But you chose to marry a man that had children. If you did not want children or any of the responsibility that comes along with them then you should have married a man without children. You may not have brought the children into the world but by marrying him you agree to be his partner in all things that includes his children. I am not saying you take over the mother's role (if the child has one)but you are an active part of the childs life. Some of us SM's have it so much easier than others, my situation is pretty easy compared to many on here.

hereiam's picture

There are so many different things at play and every situation is different.

The #1 thing seems to be lack of communication. I think a lot of people get into relationships and the next thing you know, it's serious, and then there are expectations but nothing was ever really talked about. The phrase, "It will all just work out", comes to mind. Um, no it won't. My husband knew from the get go that I never wanted kids and did not want the responsibility of being a mother. Not a problem, as he was a really hands on father when SD was at our house.

I only refer to her as my stepdaughter on this site and I only "parented" her when it came to things like the rules of the house. If she made a mess in our kitchen or her bedroom that was at our house, I told her to clean it up. When she was a teen, if she wanted to wear black eyeliner that made her look like a whore, I left that for her mom and dad to tell her (or not). I baked her cakes for her birthdays and sometimes did things with her, like manicures, but other times I just let her and her dad do things together. She was not the center of the universe when she came over nor did I act like she didn't exist.

SD (now 21) was 5 when her dad and I got together. I was her dad's girlfriend, then wife and she accepted me and respected me because of that, but most importantly, I was an adult and she was taught to respect adults. Period. Even now, if she doesn't agree with me, she still respects the fact that I am her dad's family. And I think that's all any of us want, at the very least, is that respect.

P.S. I had it VERY easy compared to most people here and for that I am thankful.

not-really-my-thing's picture

Seems that our situations and approach are quite similar, and I would be very pleased if my situation turned out the way yours has. Thank you.

GoodbyeNormaJean's picture

My husband can parent his kids, no problem, and he does. However, he cannot mother them. There is no substitute for a good mother.

SS is turning 14. His mother sees him once a year at best. SD is 10. BM2 has her 3 weekends a month and does nothing for her. Those kids live with me. They see how a dedicated and attentive mother treats her children, and they want that. They deserve that. Will I deny them that to spare the BMs' fee fees? No, I will not. I treat them as I treat my own children, and when their moms step up to the plate and start bringing their A game, they can take the MOM pants back.

SD5 is with us week on week off. She has an excellent mother. When SD is with me, I affectionate and caring, but there are things that are important to BM3 to do with SD, and I am not going to stand at the gate and refuse her access based on whose time it is. She is doing the MOM job, so I leave the MOM job to her. I'm glad for SD5, that she has such a mother. However, just because a child's mother is in the picture doesn't mean that the role of a mother is being fulfilled. If it weren't for me, my older 2 steps would miss out on a lot.

kitty1470's picture

Oh Hell no! Even if BM died, I would NOT mother the stepkids..!! I don't care if it makes me selfish but I am not going to come home from working all day to taking care of kids..and not being able to sleep in on weekends anymore..and not having the freedom to go out whenever I want unless I find a babysitter. Hell NO! And giving up buying clothes, shoes, antiques, etc and getting my hair done so my money goes towards them? Again..no way. I don't love them..they aren't mine. I never wanted kids of my own for all the above reasons..so Im not about to make any sort of a life sacrifice for kids that are not mine. Nope, I love my life too much to be miserable by being a mother..to anyones kids. SO understands and accepts it.

Thing is, SO works from home all day and its very slack so its not like he's too tired from a long day at work to come home to take care of his kids. Also he makes enough money to financially support those kids on his own. And when he has them, he's with them. They aren't here when he's not here. So if an opportunity comes up for him to do something while he has them, he doesn't do it. Im not a babysitter.

bi's picture

i'm not nor have i ever been interested in being a mother to sd. she has always been fdh's kid, and nothing more. i tried to be decent to her and make her feel welcome when she was with us, as i would with anyone. from the 3rd month (when she realized i wasn't going anywhere) on she has been nothing but horrid to me. she wants me to be her "mom" when it suits her and to disappear the rest of the time. we don't have to try to be motherly to these f'g brats to be shit on. we just have to have a place in their father's life. they see daddy as a possession and when daddy gets a SO/wife, suddenly the brats think someone is going to take their toy/atm/slave away from them and start getting shitty.

but thanks for blaming it on sm's for just trying to be decent human beings to these brats, something they are clearly incapable of.