You are here

Should the man be the breadwinner???

zerostepdrama's picture

I'm all about equal rights. I don't think that the man has to be the breadwinner.

BUT...

What is the appeal in taking in a man that doesn't even have 2 pennies to rub together? And then even better take on this man's kids and deal with his crazy ex. What is the appeal?

Is it low self esteem on the woman's part?

Is it equal rights?

Is it that as humans we should love someone for what they are and not what they earn or own materialistically?

How does one justify working their butt off and paying the large portion of the bills while their SO is underemployed OR spends his funds on the skids, his own hobbies, toys, etc.

I read a lot of stories on here where there is BM bashing about how lazy and underemployed she is but sounds like some of the SOs are too.

I'm not calling out anyone specific or trying to bash anyone. I know that everyone has their own stories. Not my business.

But I'm really curious as to what the circumstances are that allows a hardworking woman to end up with the stress and burden of carrying the household AND dealing with skids AND dealing with BM.

Comments

Cover1W's picture

DP is underemployed at the moment, fairly typical in his job cycle during the summers.
He makes a good rate the rest of the year so we end up pretty even overall but I do hold the steadier job. Right now I keep a tally of what he'll owe me when his pay comes back to regular again (for SDs medical premiums, any other expenses he needed me to cover for emergency, the extra payment on the Visa the last couple months, etc.).

He's good at understanding he needs to pay me back and why.

He's not lazy with his job and I know he doesn't like it...part of why he doesn't get another temp job or something in the summer I think has to do with the SDs. What's he going to do if he has to go to work? Get a child minder / sitter or something? (oh no the horror!)

He's also watching expenses very, very closely and was not looking forward to taking SD12 school clothes shopping today. SD10 opted out (she doesn't really need to much at the moment anyway) but SD12 outgrew pretty much everything from last year over the summer. BM took her shopping for some things already so I helped him and her create a "needs" not "wants" list last night and advised him where to go to get the best prices and find the biggest selection for her.

DaizyDuke's picture

I have a real issue with one person being the bread winner and the other sitting on their ass. It really has nothing to do with gender. To me it's more about one person taking advantage of another. If the man works and the woman stays home and takes care of kids that's one thing... I get that being a SAHM is WORK. But it seems like when the woman works and the man doesn't, the man is NOT doing the work of a SAHD.. more like he's acting like a man child and playing video games, ignoring household chores, sleeping til 3 pm and just being a lazy bum. I could never.

My DH does not work because he is disabled. Was law enforcement and got hurt on the job. Sure there are days when he lays in bed, but it's NOT because he's lazy, it's because he is in pain. But he also plays the role of SAHD.. he picks our BS6 up after school, takes care of him when there is no school, takes him to karate after school etc. The man truly does as much as he can. So I'm all good with that. Now if he was sitting home on his ass.. perfectly capable of working, but choosing not to then we would have a major issue.

To me a marriage is a partnership. Sure there might be times when one person has to pull more weight than the other due to circumstances, but it should not be one person doing everything all the time. It's no different than enabling a damn skid.

moeilijk's picture

I think it's about what's important to you.

My DH enjoys his job, earns good money, and adores me and DD. We live on his salary. He has zero resentment about it. It's a choice we've made as a family. There will always be choices - but how we earn and spend money, and what we do with our time are family decisions for us.

It was hard for me when we were first married. I'd moved overseas, didn't speak the language, and after 18 years of being entirely self-supporting, and working d@mn hard at it too, I couldn't find a good job. So I took a really low-level job, delivering mail. I struggled with a lot of emotions about not contributing. But the bottom line for our family situation was that my contribution via a job wasn't necessary. So I eventually learned that I am not valued for my paycheque (or my housecleaning, another topic omg!).

I have had periods since I've lived here that I have earned really good money (I learned the language, lol), and that's been nice. But now with DD, I'm glad we can arrange things so that I'm with her most of the time. I'm also glad that we have enough $$ to have a babysitter too!

But it's a balance. DH works a lot. We arrange our family life so that we usually have dinner together, and he puts DD to bed a bit more than half the time. I arrange my day so that we can eat when DH walks through the door, and that DD is otherwise ready for bed.

DH has gotten international job offers where he would have to work longer hours, and most weekends. We haven't even considered them because we value the time together so much. That's also why we haven't moved back to Canada. Longer hours, about the same take-home pay, and 1/4 the vacation time.

zerostepdrama's picture

Can you explain this more? (Sorry its probably me... late afternoon... need coffee)

ESMOD's picture

How frustrating for them. I know that the commercial air industry has really gone through changes and many jobs are nowhere near as lucrative as they were.

It's like my husband's industry that involved him being away from home for long periods of time. It was "worth it" to sacrifice while the money was good, but it is much less so at current earning levels. Quite honestly, he can make close to the same income doing different things and not travel right now. So, I understand his frustration with his options. He probably spent a lot of time and effort attaining that certification and may or may not have skills to do anything that will earn anything close to what he used to.

At some point, though he will either need to accept the new reality of the airline industry and his earning potential there, or retool for another job. Of course, that's harder at 55 than it might be at 35 but there ARE jobs out there for people who want to try.

Last In Line's picture

My ex worked for a Delta subsidiary that was sold, and sold, and sold again...each time paying him less and less until they finally laid him off...only to get rehired by a contractor doing the same job he had been doing but for way less than he had made when he first started doing that type of work. Eventually that ended too (a couple years after we split). The entire travel industry has been thru an upheaval and a lot of people have had a hard time moving to new careers.

AJanie's picture

DH is underemployed. It fluctuates, really. He also was injured on the job awhile back so was put on "light duty." Things have been real tough.

I don't make great money, right now we take home pretty much equal pay (after CS), but my job is steady.

I am not sure why I chose this difficult scenario for my life. I could very well have married my ex who is filthy rich now. Sometimes that stings. Maybe it was one part the "fixer" in me. One part of not being able to help who you truly love. One part feeling like I wanted a partner not a provider.

For me, as long as his head is in the right place and he is always trying to better himself; I am ok with it. It is when I feel he is slacking that I have a meltdown, because he comes with so much more baggage than me... it just all feels terribly unjust sometimes. I guess it depends on the day for me.

Salems Lot's picture

I think it depends of the situation...

If a parent is required to stay at home to raise the kids(lack of affordable child care for one example) then the person making the greater income should work and the other stay home, which ever it may be.

But if a man or woman is purposely under employed or unemployed and being kept, simply because he or she doesn't want to work, not because he or she can't, then that's a whole differnet ball game.

Disneyfan's picture

Or work different shifts.

I have plenty of friends who did this until the youngest child started PreK or kindergarten.

In most cases the dads worked for the MTA(mostly track workers)or the prison system (mostly guards).

This allowed both parents to contribute financially. And as one of my friends says"not waste vacation money on day care." LOL

Just J's picture

^This. DH and I have worked opposite shifts for the last 8 years, since we had our son. It has worked out perfectly for us. One of us is always home with our kids, we never have to worry about school holidays and breaks and who's gonna stay home if a kid is sick. I highly reccomend this method for avoiding costly daycare if a couple can't afford for one parent to just stay at home and not work.

Just J's picture

Starting an in home daycare isn't as easy as it sounds. There are lots of things you need to go through, and then there's the getting of the 5 other kids to watch. It's unlikely they would all come at once. And if one is a brand new mom, that is overwhelming enough without taking on 5 other babies/kids. I cannot imagine watching 5 babies in the throes of postpartum and learning how to care for my ownnewborn.

Obviously you have not had to pay for daycare for more than 2 kids or you would understand that it is very expensive and not always worth it. One kid can cost upwards of $600/month. Two could be double that, possibly less IF the daycare center gives a break for the second kid, but not all do.

Last In Line's picture

I worked in church based child care centers when my children were little. They attended for free. My income wasn't much, but it was all money that went into the household.

I did do in home care for about a year. It was VERY hard. You have people who pick kids up way late, want to drop off early, run into financial problems and can't pay you...I could go on and on. And you are the ONLY person there. Sick? Better suck it up because those other families are counting on you. There is licensing to worry about, contracts to have drawn up, insurance concerns. It isn't just a matter of "keep a couple of kids for extra money" but an awful lot of people don't realize that.

Salems Lot's picture

I tried running a day care years ago and you are absolutely right on this one....
I had a couple , the mother worked from 7am to 3pm, the father worked from 9amto 5 pm. The agreement was the father would drop off the kids around 8:30 each morning and the mother would pick the kids up around 3:30pm . I adjusted the daily rate to a lower amount because they would be there less than 8 hours a day...

After the first week the father would drop the kids off at 6:15am as the mother decided she didn't want to take the city bus to work any more and had her husband take her to work. She was able to take the bus home from work...
Then he would pick the kids up at 6:15 pm. His reason was his wife had to make dinner and couldn't do so with her kids at home....I kindly explained to him I had to make dinner for my family too.
He told me that I worked for him, and this was the way it was going to be.
He told me I had to make the kids their breakfast and dinner in addition to the lunch I already provided.
I explained to him I was offering a service then I explained to him our agreement and how his payment was based on that agreement and if he wanted that changed, he had to pay more....

The kids never came back.

tonieye11's picture

I agree with you. I just wanted to say daycare for $600/month would be a blessing to me. When my son was 3 months daycare for him was $1500/month and I wasn't even looking in the city. I have a co-worker with 3 kids in daycare at one time and it took her entire check and we're fairly well paid.

Salems Lot's picture

When my twins were that age, my oldest was 2. I couldn't return to work because of the costs. Child care for the 3 of them was 2.5 times my p take home pay! That was over 27 years ago! I tried the shift work thing when the twins were a few months old (some where around 3 to 5 months old), working evenings. It didn't work out. I was too exhausted.

Salems Lot's picture

My son and his wife have 2 children. My son works away 2 to 3 weeks at a time. He travels for work. (He was working up to 6 weeks away at a time). My daughter in-law is currently on maternity leave, but if she decides to go back to work before her oldest is in school full time she will have to pay between $1600 and $2000 per month for daycare. Her job involves shifts. When she works nights, she has to hire a babysitter and pay out more money, and still pay for her daycare position even if the kids aren't there during the day, just to keep her spot.
In my opinion, it isn't worth it at least for another year or 2 when her oldest is in school full time. She may as well enjoy her time with her kids for the next year or 2, then go back to work....

fakemommy's picture

Omg! Yes! I'm so taken back by the judgement and I'm a working mom!! Someone said 2 children could be up to $1200 a month. That's on the LOW end. I live in a very low cost of living area and 2 kids on a major discount is $1300. That is a lot. If it came down to bringing home a couple of hundred or staying home with my kids, I would stay home. I seriously cannot believe the judgement. Geezus.

ESMOD's picture

"Is it that as humans we should love someone for what they are and not what they earn or own materialistically?"

I can chime in here. As someone who makes a sufficient salary to wholly support myself in a good standard of living, I have the "luxury" of not having to choose a mate based on their relative earnings. I can make my choice of mate on other attributes that don't involve their bottom line.

In the end, the man I am currently with has made less than me during most of our years together. He also had children which further reduced his "discretionary income". He was not lazy though and was a full contributor to our relationship. A lot of the drivers behind his lower income was the fact that he has owned several small businesses. For reasons beyond his control (economy & other issues), his businesses have struggled over the past 8 years. He did work as an employee for a few years and during that time, his salary was almost 2x mine. But that industry is currently in a downtrend and he is back to earning less.

I can say this, in the last 14 years, we have only rarely had to pay any tradesman to do work on our cars,boats,power equipment homes, etc... He makes sure our animals are properly cared for (at times we had quite a herd) and that we had good meals on the table and that all my needs were taken care of.

I have never had any worry of him cheating or lying to me. When he has had money to spend, there was never any question of spending on us. He is thoughtful, hard working and faithful and loving.

Yes, there were times when I had to help pay support for the kids, but he never assumed he had any right to tell me how to spend the money I earned. He didn't spoil the kids on MY nickel (actually really not at all..lol)

So, I had the luxury of picking my mate when some may have to take the materialistic side of things more into account.

ESMOD's picture

Money isn't everything...lol. But lack of money can definitely add stress!

I am glad that my profession is both stable and provides me a high earning potential. My husband is the hardest working man I know! He has had success and he has had failures as anyone who has had their own businesses will experience.

While I may have had to carry a bigger share of the household expenses or even helped make a support payment or two. I do feel that we are partners and I have 100% supported his choices. Plus, it's not like he was asking ME to splurge on his girls on my dime. When his businesses were in leaner times, the girls didn't get showered with gifts etc.. We always did make sure we had time to take trips together though and sometimes we ate lobster and sometimes it was just hot dogs!

Last In Line's picture

I chose DH because I love who he is, not because of how much he makes.

If he didn't work by choice, I doubt I would have ever dated him--I place high value on industriousness.

ESMOD's picture

I've known several women with stay at home dad's but I'm not sure it comes up to 9% or maybe that just takes into account people "in between" jobs and in a job search phase too?

Sweet T's picture

I can relate. I do okay ( not among the top 10% but happily middle class Smile ) My new husband tells me that my pay check can beat up his... I do not care. He is a good man who doesn't need me to be his mommy. He is off work today due to a medical issue and before I left he asked me what do you need me to do around the house today? Or my favorite is that he does stuff without my needing to ask for both me and my son. That to me is priceless. He will cook and clean and take my son to get a haircut, bathes my dog. He works 11 hour days in the hot son, not feeling very well and still picks my kid up from school so that I can just come home.

New_to_this's picture

In my case, I never carried the household. DH has always made more money than me, but due to his poor saving habits, kids, divorce, and his ex's spending habits, he had nothing coming into the relationship. On the other hand, I had savings, a house, and was planning a very early retirement for myself.

DH told me a lot of things that I wanted to hear early on and I didn't know better. I had not spent a lot of time with kids in general and in the early days it was fun spending time with the kids. Little did I know there was bribery involved. DH knew I was a great catch and latched on. Lol! I still feel a little conned by DH, but I guess, everyone tries to put their best foot forward in the beginning, so I don't feel like he was intentionally duping me.

I should have gotten out later. There were so many signs...like when DH didn't have money to make a car repair. It baffled my that a grown man with a really good job and two children could not afford two grand for a new transmission. What I didn't know was that he had no cash or even credit cards because he and his ex filed for bankruptcy. Or when DH would just leave me in the middle of dates because his ex had an emergency and he had to go and get his kids (so many times...sigh). Or when his phone would blow up because she sent him 20 text messages because he wasn't responding back to her. Then he would get another 20 messages from SD relaying messages from BM.

Things are better now though. DH grew a ball and stands up for himself sometimes. We just need the other the come in so she'll completely leave us alone. We had a baby and I quit my job, so I got my early retirement (sort of). DH has learned from me and others and now saves his money and is doing a good job at it despite BM and the skids requests/demands.

I think if we were still in the same situation where we were a year into our relationship, we would not have lasted. I think it has because DH has improved a lot in his dealings with his ex, the skids, and financially.

A big part is also the fact that I like to "fix" my boyfriends, so it's a savior complex on my part too. DH jokes that there is so much fixing that I'll never leave him or that he should always make sure something needs to be fixed. We joke, but yeah, it might be true and something that I need to work on.

DaizyDuke's picture

^^^ this!! This is what my therapist told me was the reason my ExH was cheating on me. I remember sitting in her office asking her why did he cheat?! It was an answer that I really needed to know, because I felt like it somehow had to be MY fault, and something that I needed to "fix". Was I too fat, too boring, too nice.. too what??????

She said it was none of those things, that the fact that he was an alcoholic and the fact that I had a well paying, decent "status" job, while he was a bartender, making far less than me probably drove him to do it. That it bothered him terribly to feel like "less than a man" so he found a woman who had even lower "status" than him (a bar fly with a p/t minimum wage go nowhere job, 40 years old and still living with her mother) and took up with her because it made him feel better about himself. I told her that I NEVER made him feel like he was "less" than me, I never said anything about his job or how much he made etc, NEVER!!! so why would he feel like that? She said it's a man thing and an alcoholic thing.

I know it drives my DH bonkers that he can't work, especially since it's not his fault.. someone else took that ability away from him which makes it even worse. But he deals with it and I know he actually enjoys being able to pick BS6 up from school and take him to karate etc. He has often mentioned that if he was still working, because of the nature of his job he would have to be doing shift work, working doubles, holidays etc and would miss out on a lot so at least there is that for him.

ESMOD's picture

My first husband fit this insecure mold. Again, I was the steady (good) income earner. I owned my own home and had a paid for car when we got married. My EX did work at an "ok" job but definitely had champagne tastes and urged us to "upgrade" our lifestyle which included newer cars, bigger homes etc... Only problem was that he was not a steady earner when he would intermittently lose his jobs. So, I ended up shouldering all the weight for those months when he was "in between" work. Not that he wasn't trying to get a job but it isn't always that quick and easy. Of course, he eventually cheated on me and I think a large part was that he felt emasculated by the fact that I was better employed/educated than him.

My current DH doesn't have a college degree but has a professional certification that is equitable with my education. He has never been threatened by my ability to earn and has in fact only been proud. He has never asked me to cover his bills but I have volunteered at times when I knew he had few other options and the alternative (in CS) would have been his EX taking him to court which would have been even more costly for our household anyway. So the few hundred I kicked in occasionally wasn't a big deal.

We really have a partnership that means we support each other 100%. I never would think of pointing out the inequality of our earning when I was in the higher position and he always talks about how smart and capable I am and how we are lucky to have the stability of my position. True partnership doesn't harbor resentment.

zerostepdrama's picture

So interesting reading everyone's comments... and perspectives.

My DH is probably at his earning capacity with his line of work. But he does a lot of side jobs that brings in extra.

He is a hard worker. I know that. I see that. For me it's all about someone who works hard.

Heck- even my Ex (BS's dad) had worked some pretty crappy jobs but he always worked. BUT he also blew money and had the capacity to do sooooooo much more (he's super smart!) but didn't pursue that because of his own issues.

I carried us and got tired of it. End of the day I just did not love him enough for that to keep being my life. Because I felt like he put his own agenda ahead of the family agenda.

So_Annoyed's picture

I've written and rewritten this about 5 times now.

My first husband, my son's dad, was the breadwinner. I did work a part-time job at home, mostly for spending money and to make my car payment. But he paid the mortgage, utilities, food, etc. I thought it would be heaven to be taken care of, but it was horrible. I hated having to explain what I spent money on and why, I felt very controlled. There were many reasons why, but this was just not for me. We divorced and I went to work FT to support myself and my child.

My 2nd husband, I thought I was getting old and that he may be my last chance at a husband. I was pretty naïve. We met at work, but within weeks of us moving in together (1.5 years later) he lost his job. I was supporting myself and my child already, so this was a huge deal to me. He was depressed and wouldn't even think about taking a job that was below him. Over the next 5 years he worked MANY jobs for a week or a month, but nothing stable and nothing that paid much. I still carried the burden financially. When he finally got a good job with the city, I was so relieved. He had benefits, retirement, great pay. He decided he liked having that money, and was not eager to share, or to pay more than his half. I cant even say how hurt and angry I was, and the resentment continued to build. We finally divorced, and he had the nerve to ask for spousal support and wanted half my retirement. Luckily my lawyer convinced him to change his mind.

DH and I started out very soon after my divorce. BM had wiped his bank acct out, he was renting a room and paying heavily for SD's CS and SS to BM. We both worked, and both made good money. He moved into my house initially, but it was very small so we found a larger one so everyone had their own room, and then some. DH never relied on me to pay his share, he always came up with whatever he needed to pay so I wasn't burdened. Now, we each work FT at good jobs, we each pay our parts and pay our child's expenses out of our separate accounts. I do have issues now with sharing my money, which I blame on my past experiences. But this works for us. If something happened to one of us, the other would step up and help out.

DaizyDuke's picture

My best friend actually has her B.S. in Business Administration, but decided to stay home and take care of kids rather than work. Her husband is the president of a large credit union, so she didn't need to work. But it drove her nuts!!!! She didn't like having to ask her DH for money and she didn't like the "stigma" that she felt was attached to SAHMs. I remember one day she was so annoyed because she wanted to surprise her DH for his birthday by buying him tickets to something but she couldn't figure out how she was going to pull it off on her "allowance" and without asking her DH for more money. I remember I was like huh? I never thought about things like that.. how it WOULD be strange to not have your own money and to have to ask for it or have it given to you.

She now works PT for a real estate company so she has her own spending money but still has the freedom to pick kids up from school and go to practices, games etc.

NoWireCoatHangarsEVER's picture

I've ended up supporting a loser man (with no BM and stepkids) TWICE!

I was in my twenties and I fell in love with a very, handsome coworker at the police department. He had two jobs when I met him. One full time at the police department with me, and one part-time at a hotel. Here is where I should have paid attention. He owed a lot of money to a lot of girlfriends of the past and was working the second job to pay the off.

So he moved in with me and quit both jobs!!!!!!!!!! he applied for the Border Patrol and they were going to take him any minute. 3 years later they took him. And as soon as he got word he left me. And I had paid everything for our entire 3 year relationship cause I thought I was investing in our future. That he was going to take me with him and that we were going to get married and have babies.
I paid off all his debts to credit card companies, to the IRS, and to those past girlfriends. They called and he was gone!!!!!!!

Of course he was back 3 days later. HE couldn't hack it. But by then I had changed the locks.

And when I met my now ex husband he had two jobs. He worked full time at the vet school and part time at the newspaper. We got married and had babies and he was inappropriately sending out sexually suggestive emails to an intern at the vet school who turned out to be underage and he lost both jobs! and I stayed with him and we went on to have three kids and he just kept cheating but this time it wasn't emails. He did clean and take care of the kids (and took care of the mistress's needs)

and I definitely supported DD2's dad financially although he makes more money than me. I paid 100 percent of the household bills while all his money went to child support and BM.

Low self esteem is a lot of it I think. And hopeium. Hope. and trickery, deceit, and tom foolery.

NoWireCoatHangarsEVER's picture

dup

NoWireCoatHangarsEVER's picture

Awwww. You are truly blessed. I guess it just comes down to character. You are a better judge of character than I am.

ESMOD's picture

My dad told my SD's that they should marry rich, divorce the guy, take half and THEN they can marry for love. oh dad.. you romantic!

tonieye11's picture

I'm the bread winner. I own the house. I make triple what SO makes so now I pay the lions share. That doesn't make him a free loader or a deadbeat, we just contribute the same percentage of our pay to household bills. For me that means I pay 2/3s of the mortgage and he pays 1/3. That I think is only fair. But we now live in a neighborhood that SO couldn't afford without me so if we weren't together he'd live someplace cheaper so technically he is contributing a fair share. Granted he's handy so although we've only lived here for 2 months he's: replaced the garage door, built a shed, fixed a wall, landscaped the property, remounted the mailbox, demoed the master bedroom and bathroom, etc. Since not all contributions are financial I completely feel like it's fair. If he did nothing he'd be out but since he does contributes how much he makes is irrelevant and since he pays his child support out the rest of his 2/3s of pay I don't feel as if I contributed to that at all.

not2sureimsaneanymore's picture

DH grew up traditionally to believe the man should be the breadwinner, but my own paranoia won't allow me to not bring in income.

Thankfully my job as a landlord from the assets I brought into the marriage affords me to be both an equal contributor and a SAHM. So finances are NOT a factor if we ever decide to divorce. I never wanted finances to be a factor as to whether or not I be miserable in a relationship.

He brings home less take home than I do but it doesn't affect how much he contributes because he can still cover half of the household expenses.

Peridwen's picture

DH is currently the breadwinner, and was raised to believe that a man who can't provide for his family (including allowing his bride to be a SAHM) isn't working hard enough. It doesn't mean I don't work, but he sometimes feels like a failure that I have to work. I wasn't raised that way - both my parents worked and worked hard. We have separate accounts, but we don't really have separate finances. We partitioned out our budget and who pays what bills just for the best way of balancing so we don't both have empty accounts at the same time.

However I just got a promotion, and in the next two years, if I hit my marks, I will be making almost double what DH and I currently earn together. So we've talked about it and he will most likely be a SAHD and homeschooling our two boys. He will probably also have a side business since he's not good at sitting still.

Until I entered the stepworld, I'd never considered that anyone could worry about being able to "pay their own way" or making sure to financially contribute equally in a marriage. I'd always believed that when you marry you are merging all assets. There is no Mine & Yours, there is only Ours. Unfortunately there are too many selfish people in the world and that makes every need to CYA, even within a marriage. My brother learned that the hard way too. He had the same views I did, and his ex cleaned him out and left him broke. He worked full-time, she worked part-time yet she still wound up with an even half of their assets. The only lucky thing for him was that he consulted his lawyer before telling ex that he was done with her cheating ass, and they filed the papers right away. After his ex was served she'd gone out and maxed out every single joint credit card. Since the bills proved that the purchases were made AFTER the filing and serving, the judge put every cent of that debt onto her. But he had nothing.

I have an income that would cover me and my boys. DH and I do not have any joint credit cards. We do have one joint checking that utility bills and home improvement bills come out of. Beyond that, if DH told me right now he was leaving me - financially I'd be ok and I won't let that security go.

onwednesdayswewearpink's picture

I know for a fact that my dh could not handle me making more than him. And as bad as this sounds I like being taken care of.

ESMOD's picture

I don't think you can apply a hard and fast 70/30 rule. In our house both my DH and I like to cook. I would hazard a guess that he puts as many meals on the table as I do. (plus he cleans up MORE than I do in the kitchen...lol). He also takes care of most outside maintenance and all vehicle/machinery maintenance (4 vehicles plus mowers etc..) He takes down trees, mows acres of grass. When he is "off" he also makes sure that the dog is walked etc.. so I can get to work without worrying about things like that. He also goes to the dump etc.. We don't have "kids at home" and I grocery shop maybe once a week and he will grocery shop as well if he wants to cook something special. He does 90% of the driving when we go places (including 12 hour drives to FL). Yeah, I pick up the socks, but seriously, his clothing needs can be handled in just a few trips a year since he doesn't require "dry clean clothes" for his life. A couple pairs of sneakers, some socks/underwear, a few pair of new jeans and tshirts. Maybe the odd sweatshirt or flannel and he is good.

He will occasionally shop for himself but usually I pick up something for him while I am out shopping for myself.

He also does major renovation stuff like when he built my chicken coop and horse run in. All maintenance around the house is on him as well. Sure I pitch in and assist but he definitely more than pulls his weight even though money isn't 70/30.