That could be pretty handy, too.

"Bill, the car is making that wierd noise again."

"Jim, would you mind holding the baby? I have to take the cookies out of the oven."

"Oh, Tom, remember you promised to go show the boys how to shoot a layup after dinner."

Now, to call John and ask him to pick up that 3 gallons of milk and 2 loaves of bread.

Hell, just keep him in the bedroom. If he's hot and good at it, does he really have to brind anything else to the table? lol

I'm for it although I would want at least one other woman

I really don't know what these men are thinking. They can't even handle one woman most of the time and anyone here with BM trouble knows they have no idea what to do with 2 or more women to keep happy

"I think men could get over their jealousy quite quickly. Duke it out, have a beer and go fishing.." That made me laugh.

However, not this man!!!!

I could never share my bride with anyone else, male of female. Cheating is cheating. At least in my world. Maybe I am hyper sensitive to this because my XW was a monster whore while we were married.

Certainly history has instances where plural marriage is necessary due to wars or some other catastrophe that significantly reduces the availability of mates and I can certainly rationalize the benefits of the village model for raising children. Extended family can serve the same purpose.

But, I just can't see being married to more than one person at a time in today's society.

No judgements, just not for me.

Best regards,