Yeah, before DH and I were married, SS saved up enough money and dad allowed him to to buy himself a Wii. I guess as a single dad, you don't foresee the problems this would cause.
So, fast forward... we married and now we have Wii Fit FOR THE FAMILY, Net Flix streaming FOR THE FAMILY and my BS has also gotten various Wii games as well.
SS got Let's Dance for Christmas and BM wanted to see him 'dance' so she asked if he could bring the Wii with him on his EOW visit last weekend. We don't have cable and therefore get no reception otherwise for regular tv so all we have is the NetFlix to watch tv. Dad let him take the Wii to his moms (although he said it would be the last time). So, we had no NetFlix and BS couldn't play his games. We had to spend more money and actually rent a couple movies. ok, fine.
When SS gets mad at BS, he tells him he can't play HIS Wii. He's been warned about this before. This morning he pulled that crap. Dad is not there in the mornings. BS did something that 'bothered' him so in retaliation, when BS went to go play a game in the few minutes they have after getting ready for school, SS said he couldn't play. BS then retaliated and went and hid SS's iPod. BS put the iPod back and SS played HIS Wii. They've both been warned about this retaliation thing. BS new what he did was wrong. That's why he put the iPod back. I made him appologize. I told SS he is grounded from Wii tomorrow. Next time, it will be a week!
I told him I don't care who paid for the game, it's OUR house and he will never ever ever again tell someone they can't play his Wii.
I texted DH and told him we need a Wii because I was tired of an 11 year old dictating who and when can play the Wii when we ALL have dependencies on it.
Was this wrong?